<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Factory&#160;Farming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wholefoodsmarket.com/2008/05/factory-farming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wholefoodsmarket.com/2008/05/factory-farming/</link>
	<description>The Official Whole Foods Market Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:54:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bev</title>
		<link>http://blog.wholefoodsmarket.com/2008/05/factory-farming/comment-page-1/#comment-1996</link>
		<dc:creator>Bev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 17:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholefoodsmarket.com/socialmedia/wholegreen/2008/05/12/factory-farming/#comment-1996</guid>
		<description>I have established a bog site where I show what misuse of pesticides can do to a body. I am living it with breast cancer.

You can visit my blog at http://bitchinboutbreastcancer.blogspot.com/.

I go into why I think so many women in their 30s and 40s are being diagnosed with breast cancer.

Thank you, Whole Foods, for providing this former farm girl with sustenance I can confidently feed to my family -- away from industrialized foods...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have established a bog site where I show what misuse of pesticides can do to a body. I am living it with breast cancer.</p>
<p>You can visit my blog at <a href="http://bitchinboutbreastcancer.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://bitchinboutbreastcancer.blogspot.com/</a>.</p>
<p>I go into why I think so many women in their 30s and 40s are being diagnosed with breast cancer.</p>
<p>Thank you, Whole Foods, for providing this former farm girl with sustenance I can confidently feed to my family &#8212; away from industrialized foods&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bev</title>
		<link>http://blog.wholefoodsmarket.com/2008/05/factory-farming/comment-page-1/#comment-1995</link>
		<dc:creator>Bev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 16:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholefoodsmarket.com/socialmedia/wholegreen/2008/05/12/factory-farming/#comment-1995</guid>
		<description>I was posting on a breast cancer support site and one of the ladies was telling me how they are fighting in a community in SE Texas over the spraying of a chemical called Command. It is an herbicide and the active ingredient is clomazone. There is a list of 73 endocrine disruptors on the EPA&#039;s list... Clomazone is not on the list, but it has not been on the scene for very long, considering it was not the herbicide of choice for most farmers and not as much is published about it. In my opinion, the EPA is not being totally forthright in their information about ALL pesticide (which include herbicides).
Command is used as a pre-emergence for crops like cotton, peas, pumpkins, soybeans, sweet potatoes, tobacco, winter squash, wheat and rice.

The comment on the post was that there was at least a 7 mile drift from the herbicide, killing all in its path. The ecological damage was very apparent.

I found an interesting argument involving its use and winter squash...

The EPA is saying it is &quot;a reliable supply in the food commodity&quot;. A &quot;commenter&quot; was making claims against the EPA. The &quot;EPA has failed to conclude that the tolerance would be protective of the public health.&quot;

Then went on to say, &quot; the tolerance is unnecessary since there is &#039;no actual demonstrated need&#039; for the proposed use of clomazone in order to produce an adequate or safe food supply and no emergency condition which is uncontrollable with herbicides for which tolerances already exist.&quot;

The EPA concluded that the commenter incorrectly interpreted the standard for approval of tolerance under Federal Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act section 408. They claimed the commenter was trying to deny a &quot;tolerance solely on the basis of a calculation of the risks posed by pesticide residues on agricultural products. Instead, the Agency must balance these risks against the benefits of the pesticide for food production.&quot;

SOURCE: http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/herb-growthreg/cacodylic-cymoxanil/clomazone/clomazone/clomazone-tol-squash.html

This is the agency that is saying what is and isn&#039;t okay to go into our food source. You know, the stuff we as moms (and dads) lovingly and trustingly give to our kids thinking it is 100% safe -- to nourish their bodies so they can grow to be strong and healthy? But at who&#039;s expense? Or who&#039;s gain?

How much have chemical companies contributed to political campaigns?

Indonesia is ahead of us: In 1986, Indonesia banned 57 types of pesticides. Farmers were taught Integrated Pest Management (IPM) -- where they are taught to distinguish between good and bad bugs, the good bugs being predators of the bad bugs. According to Sjamsoe Soegito of the Indonesian National Development Information Office, in 3 rice crop yields (18 months), farmers reduced the number of pesticide sprays from 4.5 to .5. The yield rose from 6.1 tons to 7.4 tons per hectare (2.471 acres). The government saved 50 million in pesticide subsidies. And the ecological impact has been nothing but good.

How much oil can be saved (lowering demand) if farmers didn&#039;t have to treat their fields and crops several times a year? Again, back to supply and demand rules with oil...

Less fuel needed, possibly lowering the cost of production? Lower prices in the store? Less government assistance needed? More supplies of oil available, thus lowering the price there as well? Would that be a realistic model?

And how much does our federal government give to farmers to subsidize use of pesticides?

How much of the money saved can be put back to THE PEOPLE for health care?
Hmmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was posting on a breast cancer support site and one of the ladies was telling me how they are fighting in a community in SE Texas over the spraying of a chemical called Command. It is an herbicide and the active ingredient is clomazone. There is a list of 73 endocrine disruptors on the EPA&#8217;s list&#8230; Clomazone is not on the list, but it has not been on the scene for very long, considering it was not the herbicide of choice for most farmers and not as much is published about it. In my opinion, the EPA is not being totally forthright in their information about ALL pesticide (which include herbicides).<br />
Command is used as a pre-emergence for crops like cotton, peas, pumpkins, soybeans, sweet potatoes, tobacco, winter squash, wheat and rice.</p>
<p>The comment on the post was that there was at least a 7 mile drift from the herbicide, killing all in its path. The ecological damage was very apparent.</p>
<p>I found an interesting argument involving its use and winter squash&#8230;</p>
<p>The EPA is saying it is &#8220;a reliable supply in the food commodity&#8221;. A &#8220;commenter&#8221; was making claims against the EPA. The &#8220;EPA has failed to conclude that the tolerance would be protective of the public health.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then went on to say, &#8221; the tolerance is unnecessary since there is &#8216;no actual demonstrated need&#8217; for the proposed use of clomazone in order to produce an adequate or safe food supply and no emergency condition which is uncontrollable with herbicides for which tolerances already exist.&#8221;</p>
<p>The EPA concluded that the commenter incorrectly interpreted the standard for approval of tolerance under Federal Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act section 408. They claimed the commenter was trying to deny a &#8220;tolerance solely on the basis of a calculation of the risks posed by pesticide residues on agricultural products. Instead, the Agency must balance these risks against the benefits of the pesticide for food production.&#8221;</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/herb-growthreg/cacodylic-cymoxanil/clomazone/clomazone/clomazone-tol-squash.html" rel="nofollow">http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/herb-growthreg/cacodylic-cymoxanil/clomazone/clomazone/clomazone-tol-squash.html</a></p>
<p>This is the agency that is saying what is and isn&#8217;t okay to go into our food source. You know, the stuff we as moms (and dads) lovingly and trustingly give to our kids thinking it is 100% safe &#8212; to nourish their bodies so they can grow to be strong and healthy? But at who&#8217;s expense? Or who&#8217;s gain?</p>
<p>How much have chemical companies contributed to political campaigns?</p>
<p>Indonesia is ahead of us: In 1986, Indonesia banned 57 types of pesticides. Farmers were taught Integrated Pest Management (IPM) &#8212; where they are taught to distinguish between good and bad bugs, the good bugs being predators of the bad bugs. According to Sjamsoe Soegito of the Indonesian National Development Information Office, in 3 rice crop yields (18 months), farmers reduced the number of pesticide sprays from 4.5 to .5. The yield rose from 6.1 tons to 7.4 tons per hectare (2.471 acres). The government saved 50 million in pesticide subsidies. And the ecological impact has been nothing but good.</p>
<p>How much oil can be saved (lowering demand) if farmers didn&#8217;t have to treat their fields and crops several times a year? Again, back to supply and demand rules with oil&#8230;</p>
<p>Less fuel needed, possibly lowering the cost of production? Lower prices in the store? Less government assistance needed? More supplies of oil available, thus lowering the price there as well? Would that be a realistic model?</p>
<p>And how much does our federal government give to farmers to subsidize use of pesticides?</p>
<p>How much of the money saved can be put back to THE PEOPLE for health care?<br />
Hmmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://blog.wholefoodsmarket.com/2008/05/factory-farming/comment-page-1/#comment-1994</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholefoodsmarket.com/socialmedia/wholegreen/2008/05/12/factory-farming/#comment-1994</guid>
		<description>Welcome to the Green Family, Carla!  We&#039;re growing in size and influence by the day and I&#039;m delighted that you&#039;ve joined us.  The status quo cannot be changed without activism, so make your voice heard: contact your political representatives regularly and work to transform your neighborhood and community.
thanks,
jerry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Green Family, Carla!  We&#8217;re growing in size and influence by the day and I&#8217;m delighted that you&#8217;ve joined us.  The status quo cannot be changed without activism, so make your voice heard: contact your political representatives regularly and work to transform your neighborhood and community.<br />
thanks,<br />
jerry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla Pullum</title>
		<link>http://blog.wholefoodsmarket.com/2008/05/factory-farming/comment-page-1/#comment-1993</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla Pullum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 22:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholefoodsmarket.com/socialmedia/wholegreen/2008/05/12/factory-farming/#comment-1993</guid>
		<description>I am so glad I found this blog. I am so new to this organic thing and just thought it was for rich people trying to eat healthy. Not know ing that this effects everyone. The benefits and how our food is produced so much information. How do we process all of this? I am sharing this with my kids tonight is family night!
Thanks for the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so glad I found this blog. I am so new to this organic thing and just thought it was for rich people trying to eat healthy. Not know ing that this effects everyone. The benefits and how our food is produced so much information. How do we process all of this? I am sharing this with my kids tonight is family night!<br />
Thanks for the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kara</title>
		<link>http://blog.wholefoodsmarket.com/2008/05/factory-farming/comment-page-1/#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator>Kara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholefoodsmarket.com/socialmedia/wholegreen/2008/05/12/factory-farming/#comment-1992</guid>
		<description>I recently finished reading &quot;Real Food: What to Eat and Why&quot; by Nina Pollack. It is chock-full of statistics and compelling information about the lack of quality in food that has been factory-farmed, and how we as a society have lost so much in good health both by eating low-quality food in addition to processed &quot;food&quot;. I highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in knowing more and doing better with their nutrition.

I&#039;m really grateful that our Whole Foods provides a number of options for local food that has been raised traditionally. We can get several kinds of milk from local dairies, eggs and butter from a local farm, and grass-fed beef as well as several produce items. My family&#039;s grocery bill has been steadily climbing as I have learned more about getting quality food and made a commitment to eating well, but it is a top priority for us and I&#039;m willing to budget less to other areas of our lives. We have also cut back our meat consumption significantly, so even though we eat it less often it is of a high quality - from a local farmer, raised humanely with plenty of access to pasture and no antibiotics or growth hormones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently finished reading &#8220;Real Food: What to Eat and Why&#8221; by Nina Pollack. It is chock-full of statistics and compelling information about the lack of quality in food that has been factory-farmed, and how we as a society have lost so much in good health both by eating low-quality food in addition to processed &#8220;food&#8221;. I highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in knowing more and doing better with their nutrition.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really grateful that our Whole Foods provides a number of options for local food that has been raised traditionally. We can get several kinds of milk from local dairies, eggs and butter from a local farm, and grass-fed beef as well as several produce items. My family&#8217;s grocery bill has been steadily climbing as I have learned more about getting quality food and made a commitment to eating well, but it is a top priority for us and I&#8217;m willing to budget less to other areas of our lives. We have also cut back our meat consumption significantly, so even though we eat it less often it is of a high quality &#8211; from a local farmer, raised humanely with plenty of access to pasture and no antibiotics or growth hormones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://blog.wholefoodsmarket.com/2008/05/factory-farming/comment-page-1/#comment-1991</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholefoodsmarket.com/socialmedia/wholegreen/2008/05/12/factory-farming/#comment-1991</guid>
		<description>I have wondered for a very long time why the government subsidizes corn and soybeans production on huge farms that monocrop year after year when neither high fructose corn syrup or partially hydrogenated soybean oil apear on the food pyramid, thank god! So why don&#039;t they subsidize fruits and vegetables, grown sustainably and organically? A single farmer can receive hundreds of thousand of taxpayer dollars in subsidies to produce products that have been implicated in disease processes, go figure! Wish it was called the FOOD BILL rather than the farm bill, more people might pay attention to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have wondered for a very long time why the government subsidizes corn and soybeans production on huge farms that monocrop year after year when neither high fructose corn syrup or partially hydrogenated soybean oil apear on the food pyramid, thank god! So why don&#8217;t they subsidize fruits and vegetables, grown sustainably and organically? A single farmer can receive hundreds of thousand of taxpayer dollars in subsidies to produce products that have been implicated in disease processes, go figure! Wish it was called the FOOD BILL rather than the farm bill, more people might pay attention to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micki</title>
		<link>http://blog.wholefoodsmarket.com/2008/05/factory-farming/comment-page-1/#comment-1990</link>
		<dc:creator>Micki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 06:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholefoodsmarket.com/socialmedia/wholegreen/2008/05/12/factory-farming/#comment-1990</guid>
		<description>Everybody should be aware of everything that Factory Farming involves.  Not just the use of tainted food, chemicals, antibiotics, growth hormones, but how the animals are treated.  It is part of humanity to have compassion and respect for all living beings, and that includes our food.  I have done extensive research into factory farming, and the abuse and emotional suffering these poor animals go through, is immeasurable.  And have you ever thought about what the stress hormones these animals release do in your body?  Then there is the transport to the slaughterhouses, which in itself can be horrendous...and then there is the slaughterhouse!  Anybody who has ever realized the abuse that goes on there, and the inhumane methods of killing, would either never eat meat again, or would make sure that they would only buy meat that came from a slaughterhouse that treated and killed the animals humanely (such as beef that comes from the Blue Goose Cattle Company, sold at Whole Food).  Think you&#039;re safe with organic meat?  Not necessarily!  The standards that organically-raised animals are supposed to be treated under in the slaugherhouses are sometimes not upheld, due to a shortage of facilities - so the animals often go to a regular slaughterhouse.  So if you eat meat, make sure you do all the research first - research the farm they came from, and the slaughterhouse!  Chickens and pigs are treated and killed in the worst manner of all.  The same goes for milk products.  It&#039;s not good enough not to want to know, not to want to do the work.  Care about your food, no matter what it is.  And care about the sources they come from.  Support local farmers, and fight to have the new laws of sole government slaughterhouses abolished, so that the animals can stay on their small farms from beginning to end, and get the life they deserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody should be aware of everything that Factory Farming involves.  Not just the use of tainted food, chemicals, antibiotics, growth hormones, but how the animals are treated.  It is part of humanity to have compassion and respect for all living beings, and that includes our food.  I have done extensive research into factory farming, and the abuse and emotional suffering these poor animals go through, is immeasurable.  And have you ever thought about what the stress hormones these animals release do in your body?  Then there is the transport to the slaughterhouses, which in itself can be horrendous&#8230;and then there is the slaughterhouse!  Anybody who has ever realized the abuse that goes on there, and the inhumane methods of killing, would either never eat meat again, or would make sure that they would only buy meat that came from a slaughterhouse that treated and killed the animals humanely (such as beef that comes from the Blue Goose Cattle Company, sold at Whole Food).  Think you&#8217;re safe with organic meat?  Not necessarily!  The standards that organically-raised animals are supposed to be treated under in the slaugherhouses are sometimes not upheld, due to a shortage of facilities &#8211; so the animals often go to a regular slaughterhouse.  So if you eat meat, make sure you do all the research first &#8211; research the farm they came from, and the slaughterhouse!  Chickens and pigs are treated and killed in the worst manner of all.  The same goes for milk products.  It&#8217;s not good enough not to want to know, not to want to do the work.  Care about your food, no matter what it is.  And care about the sources they come from.  Support local farmers, and fight to have the new laws of sole government slaughterhouses abolished, so that the animals can stay on their small farms from beginning to end, and get the life they deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://blog.wholefoodsmarket.com/2008/05/factory-farming/comment-page-1/#comment-1989</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholefoodsmarket.com/socialmedia/wholegreen/2008/05/12/factory-farming/#comment-1989</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m telling everyone I know to read the Omnivores Dilemma, by Michael Pollen. The entire storyline revolves around where the ingredients for his meals are coming from. Clearly there is a large, thoughtful community of people just like Pollen and us, who for a variety of reasons are turning away from the old 20th century &quot;Fordist&quot; technology of factory farms and returning to find our &quot;roots&quot; in our local communities. There are many ways in which we can get back to basics. We can:

Make mindful decisions about where we shop and what we buy. Stores such as Whole Foods are a great choice, but still not always &quot;everyday&quot; accessible to lower income families. Local growers-markets are becoming more economical and they are fun. We need to have a variety of healthy, sustainable choices.

Cut back on meat. Pollens&#039; book impressed upon me the stunning amount of energy that goes into the production of meat, so - my husband and I have cut way back and enjoyed surprising results, one of which is that we are really incorporating a lot more vegetables into our diets. That has to be better for us, right? We still get plenty of protein from beans and nuts and we eat &#039;meat&#039; once or twice a week. The upshot is that &#039;meat&#039; has become a treat to us, something that we appreciate rather than take for granted. And because we eat so much less of it now, we really take our time picking it out at the store and can buy the best cuts and choose organic which would have been cost prohibitive before. Another surprise our new lifestyle has offered us is a rediscovery of my love of cooking. Since our way of eating is changing, I have to find new and varied recipes for the weeks&#039; menu, often vegetarian! I don&#039;t know much about vegetarian cooking -so I have had to delve into all sorts of new and interesting cookbooks. It&#039;s been a trip.

Finally, I believe that buying local is the best thing we can do for the larger environment and for our own communities at the same time. If we support our local growers, they&#039;ll stick around rather than sell off to developers, and in turn we&#039;ll have more open space and less hopscotch development creating domino effects on the environment. Additionally, locally grown and raised means our food is more closely under our own watchful gaze where we can see if pesticides are being applied, too much water is being wasted, animals are being inhumanely raised, etc... Green markets such as Whole Foods help sustain these growers and ranchers. They help sustain our communities and so should we. Buy local!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m telling everyone I know to read the Omnivores Dilemma, by Michael Pollen. The entire storyline revolves around where the ingredients for his meals are coming from. Clearly there is a large, thoughtful community of people just like Pollen and us, who for a variety of reasons are turning away from the old 20th century &#8220;Fordist&#8221; technology of factory farms and returning to find our &#8220;roots&#8221; in our local communities. There are many ways in which we can get back to basics. We can:</p>
<p>Make mindful decisions about where we shop and what we buy. Stores such as Whole Foods are a great choice, but still not always &#8220;everyday&#8221; accessible to lower income families. Local growers-markets are becoming more economical and they are fun. We need to have a variety of healthy, sustainable choices.</p>
<p>Cut back on meat. Pollens&#8217; book impressed upon me the stunning amount of energy that goes into the production of meat, so &#8211; my husband and I have cut way back and enjoyed surprising results, one of which is that we are really incorporating a lot more vegetables into our diets. That has to be better for us, right? We still get plenty of protein from beans and nuts and we eat &#8216;meat&#8217; once or twice a week. The upshot is that &#8216;meat&#8217; has become a treat to us, something that we appreciate rather than take for granted. And because we eat so much less of it now, we really take our time picking it out at the store and can buy the best cuts and choose organic which would have been cost prohibitive before. Another surprise our new lifestyle has offered us is a rediscovery of my love of cooking. Since our way of eating is changing, I have to find new and varied recipes for the weeks&#8217; menu, often vegetarian! I don&#8217;t know much about vegetarian cooking -so I have had to delve into all sorts of new and interesting cookbooks. It&#8217;s been a trip.</p>
<p>Finally, I believe that buying local is the best thing we can do for the larger environment and for our own communities at the same time. If we support our local growers, they&#8217;ll stick around rather than sell off to developers, and in turn we&#8217;ll have more open space and less hopscotch development creating domino effects on the environment. Additionally, locally grown and raised means our food is more closely under our own watchful gaze where we can see if pesticides are being applied, too much water is being wasted, animals are being inhumanely raised, etc&#8230; Green markets such as Whole Foods help sustain these growers and ranchers. They help sustain our communities and so should we. Buy local!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://blog.wholefoodsmarket.com/2008/05/factory-farming/comment-page-1/#comment-1988</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholefoodsmarket.com/socialmedia/wholegreen/2008/05/12/factory-farming/#comment-1988</guid>
		<description>Aside from the fact that use of the word farming is technically a tad misleading since it refers more to growing plants than to raising animals (animals would generally be ranching).  Factory farming of any sort is generally a bad idea.

I grew up around this stuff.  What it does - to the plants or animals, to the worker, to the land, to the water, even to the communities  - in many ways resembles some horrific nightmare.  Weirdly manipulated, be that via hormones, antibiotics, hybridizing, or even GMO if they can sneak it in, plants and animals that are far from what nature created and functioning far from what was intended...if not ill.  Abused workers whose rights are violated and whose employers often fail to follow even common sense safety rules - and as a result workers are often sick or injured.  The land is often worn out and/or contaminated.  The water is frequently full of bacterial and/or chemical contaminants.  The area&#039;s people and wildlife get strange diseases at high rates. Neighboring, smaller farms and ranches are bullied into doing whatever, however the corporate farm wants - or they&#039;re driven out of business for refusing.

There&#039;s a reason why this now city resident won&#039;t drink unfiltered tap water, buys meats that are at least free of hormones and antibiotics, buys dairy without rGBH, and buys organic produce.  I don&#039;t want to feed that corporate sickness machine.  It goes far beyond global warming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from the fact that use of the word farming is technically a tad misleading since it refers more to growing plants than to raising animals (animals would generally be ranching).  Factory farming of any sort is generally a bad idea.</p>
<p>I grew up around this stuff.  What it does &#8211; to the plants or animals, to the worker, to the land, to the water, even to the communities  &#8211; in many ways resembles some horrific nightmare.  Weirdly manipulated, be that via hormones, antibiotics, hybridizing, or even GMO if they can sneak it in, plants and animals that are far from what nature created and functioning far from what was intended&#8230;if not ill.  Abused workers whose rights are violated and whose employers often fail to follow even common sense safety rules &#8211; and as a result workers are often sick or injured.  The land is often worn out and/or contaminated.  The water is frequently full of bacterial and/or chemical contaminants.  The area&#8217;s people and wildlife get strange diseases at high rates. Neighboring, smaller farms and ranches are bullied into doing whatever, however the corporate farm wants &#8211; or they&#8217;re driven out of business for refusing.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason why this now city resident won&#8217;t drink unfiltered tap water, buys meats that are at least free of hormones and antibiotics, buys dairy without rGBH, and buys organic produce.  I don&#8217;t want to feed that corporate sickness machine.  It goes far beyond global warming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet</title>
		<link>http://blog.wholefoodsmarket.com/2008/05/factory-farming/comment-page-1/#comment-1987</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholefoodsmarket.com/socialmedia/wholegreen/2008/05/12/factory-farming/#comment-1987</guid>
		<description>The most meaningful way to stop contributing to global warming is to stop eating meat.  You don&#039;t eat it, factory farms go out of business.  It really is that simple.  Instead of finding excuses for continuing to eat dead animals, just say no!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most meaningful way to stop contributing to global warming is to stop eating meat.  You don&#8217;t eat it, factory farms go out of business.  It really is that simple.  Instead of finding excuses for continuing to eat dead animals, just say no!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
